The Secret Society of Anthropologists
4 comments
Comment from: lorenz
Interesting! Thanks. I’ve checked it on their website. Seems to be less formal than becoming member in the ASA, though. It’s sufficent to have the recommendations of two members, that’s all.
In the case of the GAA I think the obligatory recommendation is just a formalism, which means I don’t believe anyone will be rejected, as it sounds to be possible with ASA.
Nonetheless these formalisms signify difference. Compared with the procedure that is practised by the CASCA in both cases of GAA and ASA less openness is demonstrated.
[Don’t get me wrong: This is not meant to be an expression of great insight, its notions of open- or closedness like that that keep me going in regards of fixing national differences.]
Comment from: lorenz
Yes, of course. Here in Norway there’s no difference between joining the Anthropological Association or a sports club. Seems also to be the case with the CASCA (The Canadian Anthropology Society). Maybe there are historical reasons for these differences? Or maybe these difference reflect the social structures in the respective contries?
The conditions to become a GAA (German Association for Anthropology) member are comparable. Can’t remember though, if I read anything on a “consideration” of applicants, but one needs two GAA members to recommend your application.
I am a CASCA member now.