search expand

Open access to all doctoral dissertations at Temple University

(via Open Access News) Temple University has decided to provide open access to all its doctoral dissertations, starting with those completed August 2008 as Steven Bell, Associate University Librarian announced only a few days ago.

You can browse and search the archive on the Temple University Electronic Dissertations website. A quick search revealed that there are already two anthropology dissertations available:

Carolyn P. Merritt (2008): Locating the Tango: Place and the Nuevo Social Dance Community [link removed upon request by author]

Jay F. Gabriel (2008): Objectivity and Autonomy in the Newsroom: A Field Approach

Bell explains:

Many other leading research universities have created similar “open-access” electronic dissertation repositories and have found that cutting-edge doctoral research is more frequently read and cited as a result of making dissertations globally available in an open-access repository. For example, the University of Nebraska-Lincoln recently reported their open-access dissertations are downloaded sixty times more frequently than are restricted versions offered through the institutional subscription to Digital Dissertations.

He writes that the Libraries will no longer add paper copies of Temple dissertations to the Library stacks nor will it collect dissertations on microfilm.

>> see the official announcement by Temple University

“I hope that all universities will consider an Open Access mandate for electronic theses and dissertations”, comments Peter Suber from Open Access News. Furthermore, Temple should consider an Open Access mandate for peer-reviewed journal articles by faculty, for example, like the Harvard policy.

SEE ALSO:

Anthopology and open access to scholarship. New alliances threaten the American Anthropological Association

2006 – The Year of Open Access Anthropology?

ScientificCommons.org – The Open Access Search Engine

essays.se: Open access to Swedish university papers

A year ago, I wrote Already lots of publications in the open access anthropology repository Mana’o but it seems that the project is dead as the website has been down for several weeks now.

(via Open Access News) Temple University has decided to provide open access to all its doctoral dissertations, starting with those completed August 2008 as Steven Bell, Associate University Librarian announced only a few days ago.

You can browse and search…

Read more

Book Launch: The impact of electricity (Oslo)

Tuesday, 9 December, 16.00 – 17.00. Georg Sverdrups Hus, Klubben (Blindern, Oslo)

Book launch

The Impact of Electricity . Development, Desires and Dilemmas. Berghahn Books
by Tanja Winther

Umeme: Faida na Athari Zake. Uzoefu Kutoka Kijiji cha Uroa
by Tanja Winther
Translated to Swahili by Omar M. Said and Ally Saleh Khalfan
Published by SUM: publications (@) sum.uio.no

Commentators:
Pat Caplan, Professor, Department of Anthropology, Goldsmiths College, UK
Jonas Sandgren, Senior Adviser Energy, Sweco Norge AS
Kristi-Anne Stølen, Professor and Director of SUM

Refreshments will be served.

More information: http://www.sum.uio.no/calendar/pdf/2008_plakat%20boklansering%20winther.pdf

See also interview with Tanja Winther about the book

Tuesday, 9 December, 16.00 - 17.00. Georg Sverdrups Hus, Klubben (Blindern, Oslo)

Book launch

The Impact of Electricity . Development, Desires and Dilemmas. Berghahn Books
by Tanja Winther

Umeme: Faida na Athari Zake. Uzoefu Kutoka Kijiji cha Uroa
by Tanja…

Read more

Hvor “vestlig” er menneskerettighetene?

Ikke vestlige feminister, men kvinner fra Pakistan og India sørget for at FNs menneskerettighetserklæring ikke bare handler om menn. Den største motstanden mot erklæringen kom fra vestlig side, leser vi i en interessant feature i Weekendavisen.

Mange tror at FNs menneskerettighetserklæring, som fyller 60 år på onsdag, bygger på “vestlige verdier”. Dette er en myte, viser Jesper Vind Jensen og Klaus Wivel i Weekendavisen. Mange rettigheter ble tatt opp i erklæringen etter press fra aktivister fra den såkalte “ikke-vestlige” verden:

Det er den ikke særlig kendte historie bag menneskerettighedserklæringen; at den ikke var en »vestlig« opfindelse, og at delegerede for specielt Libanon og Kina i afgørende grad var til stede, da diskussionen om, hvad der skulle udgøre de 30 punkter i erklæringen, fandt sted.

Tværtimod kom nogle af de stærkeste indvendinger mod erklæringen fra vestlige antropologer, som frygtede for vestlig indblanding i skrøbelige kulturer, og fra amerikanske politikere, der med deres racisme over for de sorte i Sydstaterne ikke brød sig om erklæringens artikel 16, der gav alle voksne mennesker »ret til at gifte sig … uden begrænsninger af racemæssige, nationalitetsmæssige eller religiøse grunde.« (…) Dette var nemlig ikke tilladt i de fleste amerikanske delstater, skriver Ann Elizabeth Mayer. Især i sydstaterne var blandede ægteskaber forbudt (først tilladt i 1967)
(…)
De muslimske lande havde fokus på at få skrevet en række sociale rettigheder (artikel 22-26) ind, som harmonerede med islams sociallære (retten til arbejde, bolig, social og kulturel velfærd, retten til uddannelse, mv.). Det forsøgte USA til gengæld at bremse. Muslimerne blev her støttet af Canadas John Humphrey, af flere socialistiske delegerede fra Latinamerika og af den sovjetiske FN-ambassadør, Alexie Pavlov.
(…)
Det bliver også ofte overset, at det ikke var vestlige feminister, der sikrede kvindernes fulde lighed med mænd i menneskerettighederne. Under arbejdet med erklæringen var det kvinder fra Latinamerika og Asien, der pressede på for anerkendelse af kønnenes lighed. Således ville Eleanor Roosevelt have, at der i den engelske formulering i artikel 1 skulle stå »all men are created equal«, men på grund af pakistanske og indiske kvinders insisteren blev formuleringen ændret til »all human beings«. Som de sagde: »Hvis vi siger ‘alle mænd’, vil det kun gælde for ‘alle mænd’, når vi kommer hjem.«

>> les hele saken i Weekendavisen (link oppdatert)

SE OGSÅ:

Hvor vestlig er demokratiet?

Kvinnekamp: Ingen monopol for “vestlige” feminister

David Graeber: There never was a West! Democracy as Interstitial Cosmopolitanism

Jack Goody: “The West has never been superior”

Ikke vestlige feminister, men kvinner fra Pakistan og India sørget for at FNs menneskerettighetserklæring ikke bare handler om menn. Den største motstanden mot erklæringen kom fra vestlig side, leser vi i en interessant feature i Weekendavisen.

Mange tror at FNs…

Read more

Studerer norske studenter i Polen

Flere og flere antropologistudenter forsker på nordmenn. Mens Sandra Janzsó utforsker Oslos organiserte sjekkemiljø, holder Magnus Skjelstad på med en masteroppgave om norske medisinstudenter i Krakow.

I et helt semester fotfulgte han førsteårskullet på medisinstudiet, leser vi i Universitas. Det virker som om de norske studentene først og fremst henger rundt med andre nordmenn. “Denne intense samhandlingen”, leser vi, “har ført til at polakker ofte oppfatter studentene som turister”.

>> les hele saken i Universitas

Det er mange norske medisinstudenter i Polen og flere og flere studenter velger Øst-Europa

SE OGSÅ:

Hovedoppgave om nordmenn som sliter med integreringen

Studerte norske ghettoer i Dubai

Flere og flere antropologistudenter forsker på nordmenn. Mens Sandra Janzsó utforsker Oslos organiserte sjekkemiljø, holder Magnus Skjelstad på med en masteroppgave om norske medisinstudenter i Krakow.

I et helt semester fotfulgte han førsteårskullet på medisinstudiet, leser vi i Universitas. Det…

Read more

New Anthropology Matters out: Practicing anthropology “out of the corner of one’s eye”

Why do people wear and produce fake underwear, fake suits and fake jeans? In the new issue of Anthropology Matters, anthropologist Magdalena Craciun tells us in a well written paper about what it was like researching “the place of fake brands in lives lived in the margins of Europe”.

She has been on fieldwork in Bucharest, Istabul and in her hometown in Romania – and this was no easy undertaking. “I hope that the paper contributes to the collective effort of sharing field experiences for the benefit of other anthropologists”, she writes.

When an anthropologist studies people who wear fake clothes, Magdalena Craciun writes, she is suspected of secretly laughing at and condemning people, practices and objects. Angry reactions persisted as part of the field routine:

“You want to study how we dress in cheap clothes”; “you want to write about how we dress in turcisme [goods made in Turkey] and chinezisme [goods made in China] from Europa”; “we cannot afford good expensive clothes, like the branded ones, and you take us for people who lack taste in clothing”; “I am trying to weave an image, you come to point out the cracks and remind me of the fluff!”

It was no advantage being from the same place as her informants:

Our shared background made people less tolerant of my curiosity about things they thought I should already understand or experiences I should already have had. The presumption was that I was pretending to be an observer when in fact I was a participant, having a vested interest in trivia, and that I would go on to expose and misuse the information (Bakalaki 1997).

In the “Europa” market in Bucharest, she was also rejected as a researcher:

People working in this quasi-illegal place often had hostile attitudes towards me (journalists reported similar reactions). The few friendly traders pointed out that complicity in illegal activities “place us all in the same pot”, and being seen talking with me could be risky for them.

Then she changed her research strategy and started “practicing anthropology out of the corner of her eye”:

I pieced together various impressions, e.g. different ways of exploring the market, visitors’ clothing, ways of selecting the goods, retorts, exclamations of delight or disappointment, until I felt I saturated in this experience.
(…)
I was not looking at things from above or “nowhere”, as detachment implies, but from one side, discreetly. Instead of immersing myself into social worlds, I found myself hanging around, being here and there, grasping knowledge as it appeared, but also provoking its appearance in glimpses.

In Istanbul, I was told that the act of faking a brand is like a “spark” (kivilcim gibi). This is a pertinent image, suggesting the ephemeral, the intangible, the transient that was so central to my fieldwork (fakes are fakes only in the eyes of certain people, fakes are present only for some people, fakes happen and die out). Practicing anthropology out of the corner of one’s eye allows one to catch some of the sparks.

>> read the whole article in Anthropology Matters

>> overview over all articles in the new issue

SEE ALSO:

“Study how and why people wear denim around the world!”

Kosher cell phones, kosher bus routes and kosher clothing: Israel’s Ultra-Orthodox economy

Why do people wear and produce fake underwear, fake suits and fake jeans? In the new issue of Anthropology Matters, anthropologist Magdalena Craciun tells us in a well written paper about what it was like researching "the place of fake…

Read more