search expand

The misconceptions of slum life

More and more people are living in slums. What can be done about it?

A few weeks ago I blogged about Safaa Marafi’s thesis about neoliberal policies, urban segregation and the Egyptian revolution. Now she has published a newspaper article that is a good example of public anthropology: Living in Slums … A Historic Dilemma that Needs to be Resolved!.

Here she explains one of the most important anthropological insights. If you work with people, you need to understand their point of view. In order to solve the problems of slum life one needs to listen to the voices of the people who live there.

Efforts to develop Egypt’s slums have been going on for several years, yet without tangible change. The key aspect that is missing in these projects is getting close to these people, understanding their priorities and way of life and meeting their expectations, she writes:

Understanding their culture, needs and way of life is essential to help provide them with the necessary resources they need, whether proper education, job, medical assistance. Moreover, do they need small shops, kiosks, or commercial areas?

From this stand point, I stress on the need to conduct serious research by social scientists to understand the culture of these people through one-to-one interviews and giving them the chance to express their needs and voice their concerns. Thus, this will assist in tackling the slumization phenomenon from its grass-roots.

>> read the whole article in Al-Masry Al-Youm

Anthropologists have stressed the importance of the “native’s point of view” in development projects for many years. Nevertheless, not only in Egypt, but also in Europe, people living in poorer neighborhoods are often stigmatized. Politicians and mainstream media tend to portray them as lazy and often criminal people that have to be “civilized”. So therefore, the poor are in policymakers’ view not worth to be listened to?

Marafi’s piece reminded me of some articles about slum life that have been published recently. All of them attack these misrepresentations.

One of them is the fascinating but sad story The life and death of Khanoufa: A personal account of Cairo’s “most dangerous thug”, written by Mohamed Elmeshad.

Egyptian police claim to have captured a man they called “Cairo’s most dangerous criminal”. Elmeshad questions these and gives us the perspective from his neighborhood where some of them see him as a victim of the system he was born into. A system where being associated with a slum area limits your opportunities in life.

“He turned out how he did because the police left him no other path in life,” Khaled, one of Khanoufa’s neighbors, said. At the age of 14, after participating in a neighborhood brawl, Khanoufa spent the first of a series of six-month stints in juvenile hall for youth misdemeanors. He became “marked” by police as someone they could pin crimes on or extort for money with the threat of imprisonment.

When his father, Abdel Shakour, passed away, Khanoufa’s family could no longer afford to pay-off the police, and he began spending more and more desperate nights in prison.

“That is when he turned to a life of crime. When he realized that he would be treated as a criminal for the rest of his life, no matter what. He reached a level of despair and said, ‘They’d take me in and put me in prison, regardless,’” Khaled said. He ended up spending half of his life in prison, from his teenage years until his death.

Mohamed Elmeshad has written another article from the same neighborhood (Ezbet Abu Qarn): Cairo’s poorest residents help the less fortunate in Somalia – a powerful story about cosmopolitanism from below.

A group of young men were moved by the images they saw in the media, and decided that the famine in Somalia must become a priority during Ramadan. Within four days, they were able to gather a large sum money among the poor people to the relief effort in Somalia.

“There are old widows who rely solely on charity to stay alive, who donated what I know is a really large amount for them,” said Sayed Kamal, one of the organizers.

“We don’t have people dying from hunger in our parts, but we do know poverty better than anyone else in Egypt, and we know about the fear of going hungry,” said Gamal Abdel Maqsood, a scrap metal dealer.

People in poor areas are no passive victims but do fight for their rights. In her story Popular committees bring true spirit of democracy to the streets, political scientist Rana Khazbak describes a campaign in another poor area in Cairo, Imbaba. Ehab Ali, a member in the popular committee in Imbaba, sounds like an anthropologist when he explains their campaign:

“We wanted to do field work in the streets among people. The piece of bread we eat every day is politics, the traffic congestion is politics, and the garbage in the streets is politics. That’s why in order to solve these problems and for Egypt to become a better place, we have to start from the bottom at the grassroots level.”

The popular committees were formed during the Januar revolution to protect neighborhoods when police withdrew from the streets in the midst of nationwide protests that toppled former President Mubarak.

Alia Mossallam, PhD student at the London School of Economics, explains in her article Popular committees continue the revolution:

Born out of a moment of chaos and fear, [the popular committes] proved themselves to be capable of self-organization in the days that followed. But most importantly, they proved to people that the end of “government” did not mean the end of the world.
(…)
In this surge of grassroots activism lie potential forms for popular governance. The committees not only teach us about the specific issues facing each neighborhood, but together they can teach us something about how political representation, accountability and local governance work on the ground.

Finally, just one week ago, Amnesty International has released a report about Egypt’s slums: ‘We are not dirt’: Forced evictions in Egypt’s informal settlements.

SEE ALSO:

Slum research: "Anthropology needs to engage in an activist way"

Poverty and health policies: Listening to the poor in Bangladesh

Anthropologist calls for a greater appreciation of child labor

Urban anthropologist: "Recognize that people want to come to the big cities"

Owen Sichone: Poor African migrants no less cosmopolitan than anthropologists

Why social scientists failed to see the Egyptian revolution coming

Thesis: Neoliberal policies, urban segregation and the Egyptian revolution

More and more people are living in slums. What can be done about it?

A few weeks ago I blogged about Safaa Marafi’s thesis about neoliberal policies, urban segregation and the Egyptian revolution. Now she has published a newspaper article that…

Read more

Antropologer: – Legg til rette for sirkulær migrasjon!

Mange migranter er globale pendlere: De flytter ikke bare fra et land til et annet, men flytter fram og tilbake. Dette kalles sirkulær migrasjon.

Sosialantropologene Lisa Åkesson och Marita Eastmond fra Göteborgs universitet undersøker dette fenomen, melder Svenska Dagbladet.

De studerer politikken omkring sirkulær migrasjon i EU og Sverige og sammenligner den med migrantenes egne erfaringer. Blant annet ser de på utfordringene ved å starte opp prosjekter eller forretninger når migrantene drar “tilbake”. Folk som lever et mobilt liv møter ofte byråkratiske hindringer. De to antropologene krever derfor mer migrasjonsvennlige løsninger.

Det er spesielt migranter fra Bosnia og Cap Verde forskerne ønsker å lære av. Mange av dem engasjerer seg aktivt for å bygge opp “hjemlandet” sitt. På Cap Verde blir det faktisk forventet at du drar ut i den store verden, forteller Lisa Åkesson:

– På Kap Verde finns ett slags generell inställning att man ska åka tidigt och vara borta 20–30 år. Under den tiden ska man regelbundet skicka hem pengar, men också ha hunnit bygga sig ett hus på Kap Verde. Och så ska man återvända med en pension så hög att man kan leva på den, alternativt ha ett kapital för att investera i en affärsrörelse.

>> les hele saken i Svenska Dagbladet

Dette temaet blir inngående behandlet i boka “From Transnational Relations to Transnational Laws. Northern European Laws at the Crossroads" (Culcom, UiO). Jeg skrev om sirkulær migrasjon i min tidligere spalte i Utrop for fem år siden og valgte som overskrift – Se Sri Lanka og Norge som ett land!

Sirkulær migrasjon har forresten vært et tema i en Stortingsmelding i Norge og bl.a. FAFO har skrevet en rapport.

Åkesson har tidligere kritisert at Världskulturmuseet i Göteborg “befäster uppdelningen mellan "oss och "dom"”

SE OGSÅ:

– Migrasjon gir kvinner makt

Migrasjon mer effektiv enn bistand

Eliteinnvandring = Mer global apartheid

– Åpne grenser er løsningen

Avdekker store mangler i migrasjonsforskningen

Deadly migration: The ignored health crisis on the US-Mexican border

Mange migranter er globale pendlere: De flytter ikke bare fra et land til et annet, men flytter fram og tilbake. Dette kalles sirkulær migrasjon.

Sosialantropologene Lisa Åkesson och Marita Eastmond fra Göteborgs universitet undersøker dette fenomen, melder Svenska Dagbladet.

De…

Read more

Aud Talle (1944–2011)

Aud Talle døde den 16 august 66 år gammel, melder Sosialantropologisk institutt ved Universitetet i Oslo (SAI).

I norsk offentlighet er Aud Talle kanskje spesielt kjent for bidragene til debatten om kvinnelig omskjæring. Øst Afrika og nomadefolk var hennes feltområde. Doktorgraden fra 1988 Women at loss er blitt en internasjonal klassiker om nomadekvinners situasjon i et samfunn i endring.

“Aud har utrettet så mye, men hun hadde også mye ugjort”, skriver Benedicte Ingstad i nekrologen. Talle ønsket å ferdigstille en ny bok om masaai-kvinner, som hun har holdt kontakt med i alle år og besøkte kort tid før hun ble syk.

Personlig tenker jeg ofte på hennes perspektiv på omskjæring som også med fordel kan anvendes på andre områder: “Forståelse varer lenger enn fordømmelse”. (Bilde: UiO)

>> Nekrolog: Aud Talle (SAI, UiO) (link oppdatert med kopi

>> Aud Talle has left us (Nordiska Afrikainstituttet) (link oppdatert med kopi)

Noen tidligere saker om Aud Talle:

"Lærer oss alternativer til vår måte å leve på"

Aud Talle om omskjæring: "NRKs tall er tvilsomme"

Omskjæring: FrP ignorerer antropologen

Omskjæring: Hvorfor er ingen interessert i de positive nyhetene?

Aud Talle døde den 16 august 66 år gammel, melder Sosialantropologisk institutt ved Universitetet i Oslo (SAI).

I norsk offentlighet er Aud Talle kanskje spesielt kjent for bidragene til debatten om kvinnelig omskjæring. Øst Afrika og nomadefolk var hennes feltområde.…

Read more

Vorurteile über Stämme in Libyen: “Haben nichts mit der Realität zu tun”

Herausforderung für Libyen: Die Stämme, titelt der ZDF. 40 Stämme und Volksgruppen: Zerfällt Libyen in drei Teile? fragt die Bildzeitung besorgt.

Nach dem Fall Gaddafis wird über die Rolle der “Stämme” in Libyen diskutiert. Vieles was wir da über die Stämme zu hören bekommen, hat nichts mit der Realität zu tun, sagt Ethnologe Thomas Hüsken in einem Interview mit der taz. Von den “Spekulationen über einen möglichen Stammeskrieg” hält er nichts:

Die Vorstellung von den Stämmen als miteinander verfeindete, atavistische Gemeinschaften, die mit Blut, Ehre, Scham, Schande verbunden ist, lässt sich vielleicht gut vermarkten. Mit der Realität hat sie nichts zu tun. Die Stammespolitiker sind erfahrene Lokalpolitiker und verfügen über entsprechendes Know-how. Begriffe wie Konsens, Stabilität und Interessenausgleich sind ihnen nicht fremd (…)

Sie haben in den letzten sechs Monaten im Osten für rechtlich Stabilität gesorgt, eine friedliche Ordnung aufrechterhalten und Dienstleistungen wie Strom, Wasser gewährleistet. Das zeigt, dass das tribale System in Libyen funktioniert.

Das Spektrum politischer Ansichten innerhalb der Stämme ist gross:

Es gibt Rechtsanwälte oder Ärzte, die im Ausland waren, die ein ganz anderes politisches Portfolio haben als Politiker, die vor allem der lokalen politischen Gemeinschaft verankert und viel konservativer sind. Aber es ist nicht so, dass zwischen den Stämmen polarisiert wird. So ein Stamm ist kein kollektiver Akteur mit autoritären Kommandostrukturen.

Die Stammespolitiker sind ausserdem nicht gegen den Staat. Was sie wollen ist eine Partnerschaft. Demokratie und Tribalität widersprechen sich nicht.

>> weiter in der taz

Hüsken ist Mitarbeiter im Forschungsprojekt “Die Herausbildung nicht-staatlicher Formen von Herrschaft im heutigen Afrika” an der Uni Bayreuth.

Er ist bereits früher zu Libyen interviewt worden, u.a. im Deutschlandradio

NEU Schöner Kommentar von Ingrid Thurner, Teilnehmende Medienbeobachtung: Medien, Stämme und Stereotype:

Dieses neue Stammesdenken erinnert an die alte Ethnologie, jene Wissenschaft, die zunächst Völkerkunde genannt wurde, und die sich die außereuropäische Welt handlich in Stämme oder Ethnien einteilte.
(…)
Afrikanische Intellektuelle hatten mit dieser Einteilung gar keine Freude. Sie wussten, dass sie zu simpel ist und sozialen Realitäten nicht gerecht wird. Sie lehnten den Biologismus solcher Konstruktionen ab, und sie warfen der Ethnologie Tribalismus vor, den es zu überwinden gelte. Denn Menschen leben nicht isoliert nebeneinander, sondern sie teilen Lebensräume und Ressourcen, gehen Symbiosen, Allianzen, Konflikte und Heiraten ein.

SIEHE AUCH:

Tunesien, Libyen und Ägypten: Medien interviewen Ethnologinnen

Anthropologists and stereotypes about Libya and Japan

“Stone Age Tribes", tsunami and racist evolutionism

Ethnologe: Afro-Festivale schüren Vorurteile

Kritisiert ethnologische "Stammesforschung"

Herausforderung für Libyen: Die Stämme, titelt der ZDF. 40 Stämme und Volksgruppen: Zerfällt Libyen in drei Teile? fragt die Bildzeitung besorgt.

Nach dem Fall Gaddafis wird über die Rolle der “Stämme” in Libyen diskutiert. Vieles was wir da über die Stämme…

Read more

Deadly migration: The ignored health crisis on the US-Mexican border

A multi-dimensional public health crisis is unfolding on the U.S.-Mexico border that few seem ready to acknowledge, anthropologists Rachel Stonecipher & Sarah Willen write on the Access Denied blog.

The complexity of this crisis came to light during a recent study tour to Tucson, Arizona, in which Rachel Stonecipher took part.

Dehydration and heat-related illness claim hundreds of lives annually, and many of these deaths go unrecorded. No uniform system exists to count or repatriate remains. “We can only imagine the impact of these missed opportunities for identification on family members searching for their loved ones”, Stonecipher and Willen write.

For migrants who do reach their destination but face subsequent arrest, “interception” itself can involve serious health risks:

What happens to migrants after they are arrested and detained often remains shrouded from both the public eye and, to a great extent, the eyes of the human rights community. This is a particularly grave concern when arrested individuals already are sick or injured. (…) One especially serious concern involves the deportation of injured individuals who have not yet been medically stabilized. (…)

Detainees are also at risk of abuse – physical and mental – at the hands of police and Border Patrol officers. Despite official denials, No More Deaths, the Border Action Network, and other NGOs have collected and responded to numerous reports of abuse.

Through water stations, humanitarian aid camps, and desert patrols, a handful of NGOs provide assistance to migrants in need. But this cross-border health crisis is “far too vast for activists to address alone”, the anthropologists note:

Both human rights principles and contemporary realities demand that we hold countries with porous borders – including but not only the U.S. – accountable. Not only must such countries recognize migration as an enduring global phenomenon with complex causes and share accountability for both lives and deaths, but they must also engage in transnational public health efforts to develop the kind of multi-layered interventions needed to protect human life in border regions. (…)

Like the humanitarian organizations that work along the border, we all must insist on an expansive understanding of “public health” that recognizes people in transit as members of a common moral community: as people who are connected to us, and whose lives matter. Whether or not we understand or agree with the choice to migrate, activists along the U.S.-Mexico border remind us that border crossers are human beings who – like all other members of our moral community – are deserving of health-related attention, investment, and care.

>> read the whole post at Access Denied

SEE ALSO:

The "illegal" anthropologist: Shahram Khosravi’s Auto-Ethnography of Borders

"Human smugglers fight global apartheid"

No more conferences in Arizona: Anthropologists condemn Immigration Law

Why borders don’t help – An engaged anthropology of the US-Mexican border

Online: On the Margins – An Ethnography from the US-Mexican Border

Migration: Paperless underclass exposes dark side of Europe

"Ethnographic perspectives needed in discussion on public health care system"

A multi-dimensional public health crisis is unfolding on the U.S.-Mexico border that few seem ready to acknowledge, anthropologists Rachel Stonecipher & Sarah Willen write on the Access Denied blog.

The complexity of this crisis came to light during a recent study…

Read more