search expand

Jonathan Friedman: Forlater Sverige med glede

“Jonathan Friedman har en stor käft och är inte rädd för att öppna den.” Slik begynner portrettet av den verdenskjente antropologen i studentavisa Lundagård.

Friedman har for tre måneder siden sagt opp sin stilling ved Lunds universitet i protest: For mye byråkrati, for mye toppstyring, for lite tid til forskning, mente han.

I intervjuet med studentavisa utdyper han kritikken sin. Han sier at han ser fram mot pensjonisttilværelsen:


– Då får man äntligen ägna sig åt att forska på heltid. Alldeles för mycket tid i dag går åt till byråkrati inom universitetet. Man hinner inte forska på arbetstid. Var tredje månad är vi tvungna att skriva rapporter som ingen läser eller utvärderar.


Overalt i Europa har myndighetene kuttet i universitetetssektoren. Mens en protesterer i andre land, godtar en innføringen av New Public Management på universitetene i Sverige:

– Är det ett problem i Frankrike skriver folk böcker om det. I Sverige pratar man inte om det för det är ”pinsamt”: man kan prata om pengar, men aldrig om den ekonomiska krisen, att pengarna försvinner. I stället pratar man om ”kvalitetsutveckling”.


– Den politiska kulturen har tagit sig in på universiteten – man kan säga vad som helst i dag och det motsatta i morgon. Det är byråkratspråk och maktspråk. På instutionen får vi hela tiden höra att allt är vårt fel – ”folk klagar” – men det är aldrig sakligt. Det är mer som mobbning, nästan psykotiskt.

På spørsmålet om antropologien har en framtid i Sverige svarer han:

– Här är man inte så intresserade av samhällskunskap och humaniora, företagsekonomi är mer populärt. Rädslan för att inte få jobb stoppar många. Kunskap är en lång process, man använder inte alltid det man lärt sig på ett praktiskt sätt. Det är därför grundforskning är så viktigt. Men det finns ingen allmän kunskapslängtan i Sverige.

Friedman, som er gift med antropologen Kajsa Ekholm Friedman, forteller også om framtidsplaner:

– Vi pratar om att köpa en husvagn och bosätta oss bland fattiga amerikaner i en ”trailer park” och försöka förstå oss på hur de lever och interagerar. Fältarbete där är outforskad mark för antropologin.

>> les hele saken i Lundagård

OPPDATERING: Sydsvenskan informerer om at striden dreier seg om Friedman kan få lønn fra to universiteter, les Professor får inte ha dubbla jobb

Friedman er ikke den eneste som er kritisk til utviklingen innen akademia, se et utvalg av tidligere saker:

Farvel til gaveøkonomien? Hylland Eriksen varsler døden for den frie kunnskapsutvikling

– Kvalitetsreformen truer antropologifaget

“Sovjet-liknende produksjonskvoter truer forskningsfriheten”

Meningen med universitetet: Ut mot “produktifiseringen” av utdanningen

Opprop: Forskningsfinanseringen en trussel mot vitenskapen og demokratiet

Protests at Yale: When Walmart’s management principles run an anthropology department

"Jonathan Friedman har en stor käft och är inte rädd för att öppna den." Slik begynner portrettet av den verdenskjente antropologen i studentavisa Lundagård.

Friedman har for tre måneder siden sagt opp sin stilling ved Lunds universitet i protest: …

Read more

Skal bringe sammen klima og antropologi

Den danske antropologen Kirsten Hastrup skal bygge opp et nytt klimasenter under Institut for Antropologi i København. Det EU-støttede prosjekt skal bringe klimadebatten og antropologi sammen, melder danske aviser.

Senteret skal ta seg av de sosiale konsekvensene av klimaendringer: Hvilke konsekvenser har klimaendringene for dagliglivet vårt? Og hvordan kan vi takle slike endringer?

Antropologen sier:

“Vi har brug for at få belyst alle de menneskelige vinkler på fremtidige klimaændringer. Det kan give os vigtig viden om, hvad der reelt kan gøres ved de problemer, der opstår, der hvor folk bor og lever”

>> les pressemeldingen

I Norge har forskningsprogrammet PLAN vært opptatt av lignende spørsmål. Mer enn 20 samfunnsvitere undersøker hvordan Norge kommer til å håndtere et varmere klima med flere stormer, hetebølger og flommer, forteller forskningsleder Karen O’Brien i et intervju. Det er flere antropologer involvert, bl.a. Grete Hovelsrud.

SE OGSÅ:

Håper at samfunnsforskere begynner å interessere seg for globle miljøendringer

Klimaendringer truer Arktis, kan tvinge urbefolkningen til å flytte

How Anthropologists Can Respond to Disasters

“Disasters do not just happen” – The Anthropology of Disaster (2)

Den danske antropologen Kirsten Hastrup skal bygge opp et nytt klimasenter under Institut for Antropologi i København. Det EU-støttede prosjekt skal bringe klimadebatten og antropologi sammen, melder danske aviser.

Senteret skal ta seg av de sosiale konsekvensene av klimaendringer:…

Read more

First reports from Europe’s largest anthropology conference (EASA)

logo

Today was the fifth and last day of the 10th Biennial Conference of the European Association of Social Anthropologists (EASA) in Ljubljana, Slovenia. There are no news stories yet, but anthropology students at the University of Ljubljana have already written an impressive number of reports on workshops, plenaries and poster sessions.

The students have done a real great job and I hope they will inspire other conference organizers. There are exciting things being told and discussed at conferences. But until now, these stories have stayed inside a small community of scholars. Things are changing: The Society for Applied Anthropology (SfAA) has started podcasting from their annual meetings.

EASA has started an ambitious project. Read this:

You have reached the online database of texts on the 10th Biennial Conference of the European Association of Social Anthropologists (EASA). During this event, the site is hourly updated, bringing you fresh reports on the venues (workshops, plenaries and poster sessions) as well as several interviews with the lecturers, EASA officials and other guests. All texts will be published in English language.

The reports and interviews are written by students at the Department for Ethnology and Cultural Anthropology at the Faculty of Arts in Ljubljana. Since human resources are scarce, not all venues are covered and are therefore not reported or commented. We are trying, however, to present as much material as possible by covering as much events as possible.

The reports give a great overview over current anthropological research in Europe.

Tjaša Selič and Goran Karim for example write about Michael Carrithers who is interested in the question: How can so many differences between cultures, groups of people and individuals still inspire participation, cooperation, solidarity? (pdf) Tjaša Zidarič also mentions Panayiota Toulina Demeli who is interested in how being in prison effects the social meaning of motherhood (pdf).

Nikolas Kosmatopoulos seems to have given an interesting paper in the workshop “Imagining and Constructing “Terrorism” and “War on Terror”. “Being an anthropologist in the Middle East feels almost like being a spy”, he said according to Vasja Pavlin:

(I)t is possible to be objective in such an intense field as Lebanon. There is a grey zone between the attackers and the attacked into which an anthropologist enters in order to do his or her research. By entering into this zone one immediately becomes a suspicious person.

An anthropologist has to tell his or her informants some of the intimate stuff about what he or she is doing in order to be accepted by them. The situation forces you to take a position but you cannot please everyone; if you do so you are just like a clown. He concluded that being an anthropologist in the Middle East feels almost like being a spy.

(pdf)

“Crowd crystals and birdwatchers: charismatic leadership in volunteer organisations” was the title of Dan Podjed‘s paper. In her summary, Tina Mučič informs us that the meaning of charisma and charismatic leadership is “a black hole in anthropological research” (pdf).

She also writes that “his presentation was very good and in some parts funny”.

I was surprised over the open and honest comments on the papers and the presentations. Maybe these reports may inspire some anthropologists to rethink their way of giving papers.

Tina Kranjec comments on a presentation by Elke Mader at the workshop Happiness: Anthropological Engagements:

I must say this was a very interesting paper. The author explores how fans experience, express, communicate and circulate happiness in relationship with Shah Rukh Khan. There was a lot of visual material, which was also very representative.

(pdf)

But the workshop On ‘Souvenir’: experiencing diversity, objectifying mutuality was less exciting, she writes:

After visiting two other workshops, I can say that this last one was more oriented on giving as much information as possible and not so much on trying to provoke us and making us participate by commenting and asking questions. Almost all of the lecturers were reading as fast as possible, which made the comprehension of the papers quite difficult.

(pdf)

Tina Mučič has also reviewed several presentations. An anthropologist “was reading her paper very quietly so it was difficult to understand everything”, another one “was speaking and reading very fast, almost too fast to understand the meaning of the paper.”

She liked Gillian Evans‘ presentation best:

This introduction was the most likeable. Dr. Evans was speaking aloud and her tone was resolute. She was trying to explain some terms which we did not understand and was aware that there were not only experts on this topic in the room.

It seems that more and more paper givers have used PowerPoint presentations than for two years ago when I attended the conference of the Association of Social Anthropologists of the UK and Commonwealth in Keele. Then, most presentations were so boring that I decided to stay at home. According to the students’ reports, the conference in Slovenia must have been very interesting. Their reports are very inspiring. Maybe I should have gone though?

>> overview over all reports

>> conference website

UPDATE (12.9.08) : Guest post: Review of the Moving Anthropology Student Network conference

UPDATE (3.9.08): Martha Jiménez-Rosano has written a few notes about the conference of the Moving Anthropology Student Network (MASN) that took place before the EASA conference (in Slovenia as well) and has uploaded her paper “Projectionists of Reality. When researchers project images of their own boundaries.”

UPDATE 10.11.08) Another EASA-report by Martha Jiménez-Rosano: A feeling about EASA 2008

SEE ALSO:

What’s the point of anthropology conferences? – EASA conference 2006

How To Present A Paper – or Can Anthropologists Talk?

Academic presentations: “The cure is a strong chairman and a system of lights”

Norwegian anthropology conferences are different

Anthropology and the World: What has happened at the EASA conference?

Conference Podcasting: Anthropologists thrilled to have their speeches recorded

This is conference blogging!

AAA Annual Meeting: Are blogs a better news source than corporate media?

First news from the AAA-conference?

Military spies invade anthropology conferences?

logo

Today was the fifth and last day of the 10th Biennial Conference of the European Association of Social Anthropologists (EASA) in Ljubljana, Slovenia. There are no news stories yet, but anthropology students at the University of Ljubljana have already…

Read more

“Untouched” Amazone hosted large cities – a model for the future?

The myth of the “untouched” Amazone is popular. But areas that look pristine today have been the home of large urban areas, anthropologist Michael Heckenberger has found out already five years ago.

In a new paper that was published today in Science he writes that these settlements might be a model for the future.

In a press release Heckenberger says:

If we look at your average medieval town or your average Greek polis, most are about the scale of those we find in this part of the Amazon. Only the ones we find are much more complicated in terms of their planning.
(…)
These are not cities, but this is urbanism, built around towns. The findings are important because they contradict long-held stereotypes about early Western versus early New World settlements that rest on the idea that “if you find it in Europe, it’s a city. If you find it somewhere else, it has to be something else.

They have quite remarkable planning and self-organization, more so than many classical examples of what people would call urbanism.

This new knowledge could change how conservationists approach preserving the remains of forest so heavily cleared it is the world’s largest soybean producing area. “This throws a wrench in all the models suggesting we are looking at primordial biodiversity,” Heckenberger says.

This early urban settlement can be a model for future solutions. Heckenberger and his colleagues conclude:

Long ago, Howard proposed a model for lower-density urban development, a “garden city,” designed to promote sustainable urban growth. The model proposed networks of small and well-planned towns, a “green belt” of agricultural and forest land, and a subtle gradient between urban and rural areas.

The pre-Columbian polities of the Upper Xingu developed such a system, uniquely adapted to the forested environments of the southern Amazon. The Upper Xingu is one of the largest contiguous tracts of transitional forest in the southern Amazon [the so-called “arc of deforestation”], our findings emphasize that understanding long-term change in human-natural systems has critical implications for questions of biodiversity, ecological resilience, and sustainability.

Local semi-intensive land use provides “home-grown” strategies of resource management that merit consideration in current models and applications of imported technologies, including restoration of tropical forest areas. This is particularly important in indigenous areas, which constitute over 20% of the Brazilian Amazon and “are currently the most important barrier to deforestation”.

Finally, the recognition of complex social formations, such as those of the Upper Xingu, emphasizes the need to recognize the histories, cultural rights, and concerns of indigenous peoples—the original architects and contemporary stewards of these anthropogenic landscapes—in discussions of Amazonian futures.

>> press release: ‘Pristine’ Amazonian region hosted large, urban civilization, study finds (University of Florida News)

Heckenberger has put online several papers. On the frontpage of his homepage we read “Come visit our site after August 30, 2008 for latest research results”

SEE ALSO:

Tropical Stonehenge found in the rainforest? Why so surprised over the “finding” that the early inhabitants in the rainforest were “sophisticated” people?

The Double Standards of the “Uncontacted Tribes” Circus

Anthropologists condemn the use of terms of “stone age” and “primitive”

Dissertation: Survival in the Rainforest

The myth of the "untouched" Amazone is popular. But areas that look pristine today have been the home of large urban areas, anthropologist Michael Heckenberger has found out already five years ago.

In a new paper that was published today…

Read more

How to challenge Us-and-Them thinking? Interview with Thomas Hylland Eriksen

As some of you might know, I work as a journalist at the interdisciplinary research programme Culcom – Cultural Complexity in the New Norway. I’ve just put online the English translation of my interview with Thomas Hylland Eriksen, research director of Culcom.

We talk about how hard it is to challenge conventional academic thinking and to establish a new analytical view of the world.

Thomas Hylland Eriksen says:

– What we are trying to do is shift the analytical gaze in a direction where the nation-state and the ethnic group are not viewed as the most important unit. It is here researchers like Knut Kjeldstadli have been vital in insisting on the significance of class, or Oddbjørn Leirvik, who points out that differences in value-based questions cuts across the majority and minority population.

– In this way, lines of distinction that are somewhat different than those common to immigrant research, in which an us-and-them way-of-thinking is common, get established. And in addition, the transnational perspective leads to a de-centering of the nation-state; it is almost like a small Copernican revolution.

We also talk about open access and dissemination via our website. He says:

– Working in a place where most of what is published is electronically available and can be downloaded as a PDF has been a dream of mine for many years, even in the transnational sense: Then people who are in Switzerland and India can get onto our webpages, download texts and use our research in their own work. There is no reason why this should cost money.

>> read the whole interview with Thomas Hylland Eriksen

There are two more new interviews online about related issues.

Hans Erik Næss criticizes in his thesis the methodologicial nationalism in sociology text books. Sociology does not focus enough on transnational aspects in society. His thesis contains not only suggestions for a better sociology, but also an alternative required reading list.

>> read the whole interview: “In favor of a more transnational sociology”

Gunn Camilla Stang has written one of the first studies on Polish labour migrants in Norway. She says that debates about migration should focus more on the possiblities of learning. In viewing Polish laborers primarily as (cheap) labor, companies miss out in a great deal of knowledge they could have used to improve routines and products.

>> read the whole interview “More than “social dumping””

And Arnfinn Haagensen Midtbøen explains us why Scandinavia should be illuminated as an interesting region in migration research.

>> Interview: Does migration strengthen the nation-state?

We have relaunched our website, and our English pages are “still under construction”

As some of you might know, I work as a journalist at the interdisciplinary research programme Culcom - Cultural Complexity in the New Norway. I've just put online the English translation of my interview with Thomas Hylland Eriksen, research director…

Read more